Comments on: SAF pledges to sue Seattle mayor over gun law

By: Raleigh

Raleigh — Sat, 01 May 2010 14:38:40 +0000

Why does ‘Honest-Obe’ want to take the guns out of the hands of American citizens?? Because it worked to perfection every time it was used for the same purpose as Omama….Nazi Germany…Soviet Union…Iran….Cuba….Venezuela…..ad infinitum. It turns ARMED CITIZENS into UNARMED SUBJECTS.
The National Parks legislation change was ‘in-the-works’ before O-drama got in office. He would have made sure it never got anywhere but ‘File-13′ if it was proposed now. As to the ‘why?’ of his signature on it…(1 – Don’t telegraph your intentions to the ‘enemy’ ( US…by the way…)early in the game…. (2 – He could sign an Executive Order to recind it at a convenient time…AKA a ‘Crisis not to be wasted’…real or manufactured….or just flat-out Marshall Law.
James is correct as to ‘An Unalienable Right.’ ( What part of ‘…Shall Not Be Infringed’ is not understood???)
And ‘Dragonaught’ is absolutely dead-on….the little part of Their Oath Of Office that states …” ( I ) Swear to UPHOLD and DEFEND the Constitution of The United States of America against all enemies, Foreign…AND DOMESTIC”! Violation of the ‘Domestic’ part is just as serious as the ‘Foreign’ part…it’s called SEDITION and/or TREASON.
R.–

By: JeffH

JeffH — Mon, 05 Oct 2009 01:58:45 +0000

Sorry, DC vs Heller

By: eyeswideopen

eyeswideopen — Sun, 04 Oct 2009 13:49:25 +0000

Just wondering why you all think Obama is trying to take your guns away, when he just signed law allowing guns in Parks? Why would he do that if he intends to take your guns? Duh??

By: JO NICHOLAS

JO NICHOLAS — Sun, 04 Oct 2009 01:55:52 +0000

My mama “wore army boots”, and I am proud of her and my father who also served, and all of the other family members of my family who have given their time and blood. My father taught me to be a “dead eye”. My brother has a collection of firearms as well as other weaponry, as a marshal artist of the black belt levels in Karate and Judo. I also learned marshal arts under him and his teachers. I cannot say I am innocent of anger, in fact I have quite a temper, however I believe that I can say that I have it under control. I cannot (nor do I want to) count the times my life has been on the line, usually in defense of some other not able to defend themself. My mothers’ people were hunted for sport, our people subjected to genocide. Yet I carry no arms nor defensive weaponry. I do not expect anyone else to follow my personal path. I cannot see such a world as is without weapons until there is a change in humanity, fear being the ruler of this world. I believe only the blind to reality, can follow the path of forcing others into corners to defend themselves. Even a cuddly kitten will come out with all claws and teeth when it feels itself backed into such a corner. The early settlers of this country understood this concept, and sot to guarentee their decendents this safety and sanity. Purity of heart has its reward, but sometimes blood must be shed first.

By: Rich

Rich — Sat, 03 Oct 2009 03:30:53 +0000

Hey maybe that would also be a good idea for those trial lawyers advising the people to sue Dr.’s for things that were not malpractice. I am not saying that all of the suits brought against Dr.’s are frivolous, but many many are. How about we start doing things like this to ensure the lawyers look up and understand the laws they are advising on rather than clogging our legal system with idiotic cases that should never have seen a courtroom in the first place. This is just a thought as obviously I liked the idea but am not sure if this would work to lessen or grow the amount of frivolous cases in our courts today.

By: Eric g

Eric g — Sat, 03 Oct 2009 00:54:00 +0000

Dont expect the constitution to protect any of your rights . The constitution has realy never been followed unless the government wanted to obey it . I liked the idea sueing the lawyer for giving bad advice . Unconstitutional advice , if you can get him into court and a jury , and he advised the government to do wrong , you just might win . They should pay higher malpractice insurance than doctors . I think Class action suit against the trail attorneys for murder would be a good won . becuase the attorneys have scared the doctors so much they did not dare to work on a patients and let her die , I would rather that the doctor try . NO one should bleed to death from the phemia artery with a doctor standing over you , waiting for a surgeon for three hrs . Sueing the lawyers for malpractice is better than sueing the government becuase the goivernment has passed laws that the government cant be sued . Have you ever heard the more laws the less justice . I think we live pretty good I’am well satisfied with my predicuement . but I’am very disapointed in our justice system , seems the higher the court the more disapointing . We cant even see the presidents birth certificate courts wont let us . Over 40% of the people in one State dont even believe he is a US citizen

By: Eric g

Eric g — Sat, 03 Oct 2009 00:05:00 +0000

People live in differant areas and have differant experiences .In the overpopulated cities with both parents working and hundreds of people even a 1000 living in one square block . With cops with guns always close by. I agree that with less guns some people may feel safer . I would think the cops would feel a lot safer too ,if all the people would turn in there guns ? Australia another rural country was talked into turning in their guns . instead of the crime rate going down it went up . As criminals went wild robbing and even killing more rural helpless people then ever before in Australia. Here in lies one of the problems all the people do not turn in their guns . Here in the rural america we cling to our guns . We are planning local militas Where we keep our guns in the hands of the the people now posessing them . If the crime rate goes up much more , we may have to raise taxes and buy more guns ,for people that think they may need them . A example maybe a gun for a person that has thought it necessary to have a restraining order put on someone else. If a court has issued a restraining order we will issue a gun ,unless some one objects . If anyone objects to someone having a gun we will have our law officers respond and evaluate this person . we wont allow guns to be in possession of convicted criminals or unsable people where there maybe reason to believe they may be dangerious to us or even themselves . This is gun controle , a gun controle that I believe would make us all safer ,not leave us all sitting ducks . So rural america is insanely clinging to their religion and their guns . If we are being robbed in rural america We might have to call a cop twenty five even fifty miles away . Evreything is way to late , the police say the criminals are probabley out of their juristiction by now . A study of World History says over and over that the real crime begins after the people have been seperated from their ability to defend themselves . In plain English good gun controle easy and plenty crime .

By: marvin

marvin — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:40:27 +0000

the goverment wants to take your gun befor obama gives amnesty to 20 milliom illegals with your goverment trying to give amesty and free health care and food stamps and free housing take 350 border agents from are southern border and send them to the northern border want to close gitmo with no plans on what to do with them unemployment went up last mt have,s anyone you know got a job from the obama shovle ready job you may get a job as a czar if your brain is fried or work as head of dhs and not no it is illegal to enter this country with out a visa or passport or get elected to congress or the sec of treasure if you don,t pay your taxes for 10 years

By: Harold Olsen

Harold Olsen — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:52:10 +0000

It’s for idiotic stuff like this that we voted Nickels out of office in August. He’s a lame-duck (as well as a lame-brain) mayor. Hopefully, the person we elect in November will get the message and, unlike Nickels, will listen to what the citizens of Seattle want and not just ignore them.

To Dale in Oklahoma: You’re absolutely right. But then, you have to remember, Washington is one of the most liberal, if not THE most liberal state in the union. We’re in close competition with California on that and we seem to be winning (or maybe I should say losing).

By: s c

s c — Mon, 28 Sep 2009 20:22:16 +0000

The kooks who ‘contribute’ feedback to this web site are entitled to their opinions. However, when their opinions are part of a plan to destroy our Second Amendment freedoms, we’re obligated to put these airheads in their braindead, utopia-loving place.
It’s only a matter of time until they get bold enough to put the Second Amendment to the ultimate test. That’s when they will learn the hard way that they shouldn’t have slept through history class.
It takes a special breed of mindless zombie to think that not having
weapons will make America safe. German civilians in WWII learned that lesson. Every society that dares to be inexcusably stupid will learn matters the hard way. It’s the reward they deserve for surrendering the one thing that all politicians seek to numb and destroy [the brains of the people they want to enslave].